Phosphorus, fish, and our food

This piece from NPR’s food blog, The Salt, caught my ear this morning. Our food choices are always, already, interconnected.

Take this example: traditionally phosphorus, in the form of animal waste, was used as an input for growing crops. Animals and plants were held together in a dynamic, interconnected, system.

Today, industrial fertilizers (and industrial agriculture) has allowed greater economies of scale and specificity, which has driven down prices. Great.

But it also has meant a bifurcated and disconnected patchwork of concentrated food production. Plants here. Animals there. Runoff from massive animal production facilities leads then to these valuable nutrients, like phosphorus, becoming a pollutant in streams, rivers and waterways.

Our agricultural system heavily subsidizes inputs for meat production, like corn and soybeans, making this sort of production (and waste) viable. Is there a way to change this economy? What sorts of choices could we make on the individual, household, or local level? Chime in with your thoughts.

More from Nick Babladelis

Winter’s end?

Through dune grass, ice piles up on the shore of Lake Michigan...
Read More